|
||
|
||
05 24
Greening Toronto
Doors Open Toronto takes place this weekend, May 26th and 27th. There are a number of events associated with this popular Toronto tradition but the one that has caught my eye is taking place this evening at the St. Lawrence Centre. Titled, "Building Toronto's Green Future," the panel includes: Doug Webber, Chair, Canada Green Building Council Greater Toronto Chapter and Sustainability; Practice Leader, Halsall Associates The event takes place tonight from 7:30 p.m. - 9:30 p.m. at the St. Lawrence Centre for the Arts, 27 Front St. E., two blocks east of Union Station.
05 22
Is Abu Dhabi The World Leader In Green Development?
The desert kingdom of Abu Dhabi may soon be the world’s “greenest” country. A capital city of the same name draws headlines due to the seeming excess of its architectural development. That ostentatious phase may be all but over as a new generation of green architecture is taking hold. Look at yesterday’s posting about the energy-generating high rise as an example of the new trend.
There is more. U.K. based architects and urban designers Foster + Partners are building a 6 million square metre city that will be 100% sustainable.
05 18
The Inconvenient Truth Of Suburban Sprawl
Jack Diamond, architect of the Four Seasons Centre, offers up a compelling Op-Ed (subsription only) in today's Globe and Mail. Making the case of increased densification of our urban centres, Diamond says urban sprawl is our "Inconvenient Truth." Why? It turns out that the economics of our cancer-like suburban growth don't make sense. It costs municipalities $1.40 in servicing for every dollar generated in tax revenue - not to mention the permanent destruction of fertile farm land. Guess who pays the difference. That's right. Those of use who live in the city centre where our infrastructure costs have long since been paid off. Ever wonder why the flat rate for water on your tiny semi-detached in downtown is the same as that 1/2 acre monster with a pool in North York? Well, someone has to pay for all that waste. Diamond goes on to explain why Vancouver is leading the way in Canada's urban densification. The benefits are significant: population goes up, transit rider-ship goes up, bike and pedestrian trips go up, car use goes down. Now that is sustainable. Turns out that Vancouver is almost reaching its Kyoto targets too. Toronto, are you listening? Sustainability can be achieved, and that is a truth that is not inconvenient.
05 10
Sustainable Development On Toronto’s Lower Don River
Most Torontonians know how the lower Don river takes a uniquely unnatural right turn just before reaching the lake. That part of the city remains viscerally repulsive in spite of recent attempts to green the Don. This twisted (in more ways than one), man-made affront to the Don will soon be gone if Lower Don Lands design competition winner Michael Van Valkenburg has his way. A notable team of designers including Ken Greenberg, Phillips Farevaag Smallenberg, Behnisch Architects, Limno-Tech, Inc., Applied Ecological Services, Great Eastern Ecolo gy, Transsolar, RFR Engineering, Arup, and Totten Sims Hubickiand Associates, have re-imagined the waterfront and it looks like a river delta should look - natural and they claim it will be sustainable too. The awkward Keating channel remains but in this plan the Don will rush past it following a gentle curve to the Toronto harbour. Competition organizer the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation writes: Under the winning MVVA scheme, the Lower Don Lands will be transformed into a sustainable “green” city, a new destination where city, lake, and river interact in a dynamic and balanced relationship – an urban estuary. The mouth of the Don River is the centerpiece of the MVVA design. By moving the river’s mouth from the Keating Channel to Lake Ontario, the scheme reasserts the rivers presence in the city and makes the river an iconic identity for the Lower Don Lands. For more about the competition go to the TWRC website.
04 09
Reinventing The City
The City of Winds image from R. Ouellette's Virtual Metropolis John Street Toronto CD-ROM, 1996 I hope all our readers have had as pleasurable an Easter weekend as I have. I was able to relax for a few days and catch up on some of the renovation chores around the house that remained undone. Why is it that when people of all types and backgrounds take on a big task we inevitably fall into the 80/20% rule? You know what I mean. The majority of the work gets done quickly but the remaining 20% takes disproportionately longer. The phenomenon is so ubiquitous in life that mathematicians have a name for it - the Pareto principal: The Pareto principle (also known as the 80-20 rule, the law of the vital few and the principle of factor sparsity) states that, for many phenomena, 80% of the consequences stem from 20% of the causes. Business management thinker Joseph M. Juran suggested the principle and named it after Italian economist Vilfredo Pareto, who observed that 80% of income in Italy went to 20% of the population. It is a common rule-of-thumb in business; e.g., "80% of your sales come from 20% of your clients." We don't have to make too much of a conceptual leap to see how variations of this rule play out in the way we design our city. The 80% takes the form of all the infrastructure services, roads, background buildings, and initial planning. The remaining 20% is where great cities are made or miserable cities fail. Toronto's long-suffering waterfront is probable one of our best examples of this phenomenon. Reinventing our harbourfront is taking such a disproportionate amount of time that outside observers could not be faulted if they thought it was a non-issue to Torontonians. Yet, most of us long for a sustainable waterfront that has the potential to be among the best in the world. We are getting there but are in that interminable 20% zone that, like my renovation, becomes a "Waiting for Godot" existential experience. A realistic analysis would say that the 20% component of reinventing our city falls into the realm of political expediency. It seems that generally our political class gets the idea that we have to have functional infrastructure like sewers and water and electricity. Where politicians exhibit their human frailties is in the 20% zone which is seen as non-essential or even arbitrary. We now know, however, that it is in the 20% zone of city design and execution that defines who we are as a culture and a place. Maybe that's what Meis van der Rohe was getting at with his observation that God is in the details. Every project, no matter how large, depends on the success of the smallest of its components. It is that territory - of smallness - that we really know so little about. It really remains an unknown country, a place that is still foreign to us. I've argued for some time now that new information technologies will close that 20% gap because knowledge and best-practices will become more evenly distributed and available to decision-makers. We are seeing that happen to a degree but the closer we get to solving some of the intractable design and sustainability problems that face our city(ies) the more the friction of change slows us down. Do you want to reinvent the city? Instead of making one or two beautiful buildings tackle the real problem of the 80/20 rule. If you succeed, you may not just change our city - you may change the world.
03 08
Can Designers Save Our Cities?
Request For Proposal by Arlene Gould, for Corporate Knights Magazine, Urbanization and Investment issue. Can designers save our cities? Building and landscape architects, along with industrial, interior, and graphic designers and artists can all play a pivotal role. Most of the 91,000 designers in Canada, including architects, landscape architects, industrial, interior, graphic and fashion designers, live and work in cities. With 25,000, Toronto is third in North America (behind New York and Boston) in the number of designers the city employs [DIAC Design Industry Study, 2004]. With so much creative brainpower at their disposal, you would expect Canadian cities to be at the forefront of urban innovation. Yes they have LEED-certified buildings and iconic architecture—but is that all it takes? Are designers really making an impact on sustainable city-building when it comes to economic competitiveness, social equality, public safety, an aging population, and reducing environmental impacts? Most of our cities are led by utilitarian bureaucrats rather than design thinkers. We can also lay some of the blame at the feet of a design community whose members have failed to deliver a consolidated protest against the lack of representation of their profession at city hall, or the mean-spirited RFPs that don’t allow the scope, time or money designers need to deliver breakthrough results. Design works on a grand scale, but its most profound benefits are experienced on a human level: beauty, accessibility, functionality and cohesiveness, to name a few. Our cities are missing design-led innovation in the public realm. A growing number of Canadian buildings are energy-efficient and environmentally designed. But when it comes to public space, we are still design-deprived. Most of our major cities lack the infrastructure and master plans that would inspire and enable design-led change at every level. In a humble attempt to fill the void, here are five relatively low-cost ways we can use design to enrich the fabric of our cities. Sidewalks Sidewalks are the cornerstones of city building. Urban visionaries from Jane Jacobs to Kevin Lynch have extolled the virtues of the sidewalk as an instrument of civic engagement and safety; a place for play, economic enterprise and social convergence. Well-designed streetscapes can even help reduce violent crime. But tragically, our sidewalks are being debased and ignored. Industrial and lighting designers could define our urban walkways with customized, user-friendly street furniture and theatrical lighting to establish touch points with residents. Seasoned Quebec designer Michel Dallaire provides a good model with his multiple awarding-winning urban furniture scheme for the Montreal International District (Quartier International), the vast urban development between the central business district and Old Montreal, which was designed by Daoust Lestage Architects and completed in 2003. Working with aluminum as the base material, Dallaire used advanced technological processes to fashion street and park benches, tandem lighting fixtures and posts, bicycle stands and garbage receptacles. The furniture and fixtures help extend the vision of the architects’ master plan to the street. Stories and Spaces Half of the 40,000 designers in Ontario specialize in graphic arts or visual communications. The corporate world relies on their ability to engage, inform and persuade, but they are underutilized by the public sector, particularly in public city spaces. Graphic designers combine typography, colours, symbols and pictographs to produce signage systems and environmental graphics that improve spatial orientation. These elements can also be used to characterize and brand public space, and to deliver key messages about the history and culture of specific geographic locations. Our cities could use graphic designers to create cognitive maps that would connect with various target audiences, and illustrate our cities’ unique personalities. Urban Ecology Designers and landscape (...read more...)
03 07
Canada’s Top Five Sustainable Cities
The Corporate Knights team just finished ranking Canada’s cities by their sustainability index. Here are the top five cities--number five might surprise you:
2. OTTAWA
3. KINGSTON
4. KITCHENER
|
Contribute to the MESH Cities intelligent city database. Click here.
Read what people are saying about the environmental issues that impact us all
News about wind energy
News about green investing
Blog posts about electric cars
|
The best green news sources on the Net
Treehugger
Eco Worrier
Inhabitat
Lime
World Changing
|