2006 11 16
A Green Power Corridor

image

by Toby A.A. Heaps (First published in the October edition of Corporate Knights Magazine)

How we can quench our thirst for energy and break our addiction to fossil fuels.

When Amory Lovins, the Colorado-based energy efficiency guru and chief executive of the Rocky Mountain Institute, learned that Ontario plans to plough $40 billion into nuclear power, he blew a gasket.

Download the pdf of the full article, which includes photos and charts.
From an e-mail he sent to us (which we circulated to Queen’s Park): “Nuclear power has died of an incurable attack of market forces and is way beyond any hope of revival. How can Ontario afford the most uneconomic, capital-intensive, long-lead-time technology?”

Still, the Ontario government is moving full bore ahead with plans to build two new nuclear reactors and refurbish up to half a dozen others.

What gives? Simple economics. Ontario is a power-hungry province and if nothing is done, demand will soon exceed supply. By 2025, the Ontario Power Authority estimates the province will need between 30,400 and 36,000 MW of power generation to meet peak demand times for a population projected to grow by 25 per cent, up from peak needs of 24,200 MW today. Ontario has a little over 34,000 MW at hand today, which seems enough to satisfy even the upper end of the OPA’s estimated demand in 2025. But the problem is, previous NDP and Conservative governments did almost nothing to address Ontario’s future electricity supply. As a result, most of Ontario’s current power base will be decommissioned by 2025 and only about 12,000 MW of today’s current generating capacity will be around by then (hydro, oil and gas, and one unit of Pickering A nuclear station). Interestingly, the renewables part of the provincial power portfolio seems to have the longest lasting power.

Ontario already has procurement initiatives in place for 9,520 MW, mostly from natural gas. That leaves a power gap of more than 10,000 MW on the horizon. Critically important is the fact that most of this gap is for base-load [‘reliable power’] generation capacity, which the OPA says “... dictates the types of resources which must be used to meet this need.”

‘Dictates the types of resources’ is a euphemism for ‘pump up the nuclear.’ Notwithstanding some initial political enthusiasm for energy conservation and new hydro and wind resources, Queen’s Park’s confidence in these resources as base-load supply has wilted. No wonder, when you consider the heat wave in July that drove Ontario’s energy consumption (read ‘air conditioning affinity’) to a record 27,000 MW. Meanwhile, droughts reduced water flow to hydro facilities and—the straw that broke the camel’s back—any MPPs driving past Toronto’s landmark Wind Turbine at Exhibition Place could see the turbine blades hanging motionless, contributing absolutely no power to the grid. At the same time, the province was trying to woo businesses to relocate to Ontario and having a tough time answering questions like: “Where is my factory going to get MWs when you close the coal plants?” Energy-efficient light bulbs and wind turbines don’t cut it for these guys.

The government’s answer: Natural gas-fired plants, and a promise not to get rid of coal until enough nuclear base-load capacity has been brought online. That answer seems to have worked for companies like Linamar Corporation and Toyota Canada, which recently announced investments in Ontario totalling $1.9 billion, which will create 4,300 high-quality jobs.

When you adopt this mindset, a rational person might understand why the government decided to pump $40 billion down the old nuclear path.

But when you consider that this nuclear path is littered with 300 (...read more...)

[email this story] Posted by Toby Heaps on 11/16 Comment Here (0)
2006 11 14
Water & Pollution = Waterlution

image

The U.S. had this water bottler remove its product from shelves due to choking hazard created by value-added cap design.

This months Corporate Knight magazine detailed the coming fresh-water crisis. Scientific American’s December issue offers similar warnings

While oil shortages grab the headlines, water scarcity is creating at least as many headaches around the world. The most dramatic conditions are in Asia, where the world’s two megacountries, China and India, are grappling with deepening and unsolved water challenges. China’s great northern plain, home to more than 200 million people, is generally subhumid or arid and depends on unsustainable pumping of underground aquifers for irrigation. The Yellow River has been diverted to the point that it no longer flows to the sea. Meanwhile the water tables of Beijing and other large northern cities are falling dramatically as a result of the pumping of groundwater.

Given the general uncertainty about pure water’s future, is increasingly being packaged as a luxury consumer item. But does bottled water offer us any more than locally available tap water? Here is Corporate Knight’s view on bottled water.

Myth: Bottled water comes from a “pure” source, like a bubbling mountain stream.
Reality: 40% of all bottled water comes from a municipal source rather than a natural spring, including Coca-Cola’s Dasani and PepsiCo’s Aquafina.

Myth:  The plastic bottles from bottled water are reused or recycled.
Reality:  90% of the bottles from bottled water are thrown out after one use. They take 1,000 years to biodegrade.

Myth:  Bottled water comes from a fairly local source unless otherwise indicated.
Reality: Nearly one quarter of bottled water produced crosses at least one national border to reach consumers.

Myth:  Bottled water is consumed in place of sugary fruit drinks, pop or juice.
Reality:  The majority of bottled water is consumed as a substitute for tap water.

Myth:  Bottled water comes from plentiful sources.
Reality:  The Coca-Cola water bottling plant in India has been accused of causing water shortages in 50 surrounding villages.

[email this story] Posted by Robert Ouellette on 11/14 Comment Here (0)
2006 11 13
Traffic Without Control

There is a buzz in the environmental press that so-called “modern” traffic systems that rely on red, yellow, and green lights, are not as efficient as they seem. A small town in Holland, Drachten, removed most of its traffic signals replacing them with roundabouts and smaller intersections. That decision resulted in fewer dangerous crashes and more bicycle and pedestrian traffic.

Anyone who has travelled to the world’s less developed nations knows that automobile traffic there, while chaotic by north american standards can, in fact, do a better job of moving millions while reducing all that wasted fuel consumed idling at stop lights. Don’t believe us? Here is proof.

This video from India illustrates how traffic systems can be self-organizing and efficient even if the results look like an experiment in chaos theory. I doubt if Toronto’s modern traffic control system could manage the throughput that this “control-less” T intersection achieves:

[email this story] Posted by Robert Ouellette on 11/13 Comment Here (0)
2006 11 10
Streets Are For People, Cars Are For - Gardens?

image

Yvonne Bambrick of Toronto’s Streets Are For People emailed us with the news that the “Community Vehicle Reclamation Project” was moved from Augusta Avenue in Kensington Market, to its new home behind Segovia Meats.

People are welcome to visit her when the gate is open but should take note that there is a big dog that lives back there… you can peak over the fence from the Green P lot on Bellevue - head to the N E corner of the lot.

Streets Are For People is the group behind the very popular Parking Meter Party held in September. This is the image from their web site:

image

For groups wanting to put on their own parking meter parties, here are SAFP’s tips:

Parking Meter Party Tips

FIND THE RIGHT SPOT. A business that you frequent, a bar or restaurant that knows you, can make for a useful ally. Pick a spot that suits your performance or action, ie badminton over a more narrow part of the street.

ELECTRICITY. Bands and DJs may need power. You can get a portable battery from Canadian Tire that last a good 40 minutes or so, (running a bass amp, guitar amp, and vocal amp.) Or you can sweet talk a nearby business to lend you power.

PARTNER UP. Make the spot a little festival stage, with rotating bands. This can help with gear sharing and reduce transportation efforts.

TRANSPORTATION. Stripping-down your band, or going acoustic can make it easier. Bike trailers can be borrowed from the Community Bike Network at Queen and Euclid.

MAINTAIN A SENSE OF HUMOUR. Some car drivers may get ornery and try to muscle in on your space. It’s important not to get sucked-in to a confrontation. Simply smile and show them: your ticket - your space.

COPS. If they try to hassle you simply inform them, you’ve parked your vehicle, you’ve paid the meter, you are in compliance with the law. They have no right to discriminate against your choice of vehicle. NOTE: They may try to intimidate you into leaving even though you are not breaking the law. If they insist and threaten to arrest or ticket you, you can surrender your spot and move on, (no shame in that. Nobody wants to go to jail.) or we can get a good lawyer and fight the case out in the courts and push the legal issues of space for people vs space for cars. SMILE and be REASONABLE and RESPECTFUL and none of that should happen. (We’ve never had trouble at past parties.)

SPREAD THE WORD. Invite others to take adjacent spaces. Have flyers on hand to invite others to take part in the parade. You can pick up flyers at La Palette, 256 Augusta.

DOING BUSINESS. This is where it can get dicey and you could get shut down. If you want to busk or sell a product, be discreet. Setting up shop is a heat score. Artists and artisans, perhaps have business cards available and close the sale at a later date. Busking musicians - the open case usually works well enough. Comics, actors and dancers - passing the hat after each bit can do very well. Just keep an eye out for the Heat.

RESPECT the NEIGHBOURS. If you are doing a loud performance, let the shops know that it’ll only be a half hour or forty minute set. If it’s really loud, it’s not cool to set up and play all day long, that only makes enemies. If another performer is doing a show right next to you, try alternating sets instead of going up (...read more...)

[email this story] Posted by Robert Ouellette on 11/10 Comment Here (0)
The Politics Of Green: Canadians Want Change

image
Recent surveys of Canada’s political landscape turned up some interesting trends. Canadians, much to the surprise of the current federal government, are deeply concerned about the environment. In fact, the environment ranks a close second to health care as the topic we want political action on. Surprised? George Monblot writes in yesterday’s Straight.com that Canadians rank among the worst polluters in the world:

So it’s a shock to discover that there is scarcely a whisker of difference between Canada’s greenhouse gas emissions and those of the U.S. and Australia. In Europe climate change campaigners are - as we should be - heartily ashamed of our nation’s contribution to the destruction of the biosphere. In the United Kingdom, we each produce an average of 9.5 tonnes of carbon dioxide in a year. The Germans turn out 10.2 tonnes, and the French 6.8. But the Canadians emit an average of 19.05 tonnes a year - just 50 kilos less than the Australians and a tonne less than the Americans. While emissions across much of Europe are falling, in Canada they have been rising for over 10 years.

Because of its size and northern climate, Canada’s consumption of energy trends above the world norms. However, we are also engaged in discretionary energy consumption like coal fired generators and tar sands processing that require burning vast amounts of fuel.

The only way to reduce those emissions is through regulatory action by all levels of government. Yet, the public mood for conservation of our increasingly fragile environment is not registering on their political radars. That has to change. Now that the pollution denying neo-conservative ideologues south of the border have lost their grip on power, our own conservative party is quickly rethinking its environmental position. Meanwhile, all Canadians wait expectantly for the revised energy plan the minority government is promising. 

[email this story] Posted by Robert Ouellette on 11/10 Comment Here (0)
2006 11 08
How Are The U.S. Green Funds Doing?

image
Washington forest photo from here . . .

Outside magazine has this review of U.S. based green investment funds. The punch linne is that the funds have outperformed the S&P 500 Index over the last five years.

SMART PICKS: MUTUAL FUNDS
1. Calvert Large Cap Growth Fund (clgax) Focus: Eco-savvy large-caps ($10 billion and up) Typical stock: Goldman Sachs, which promotes mandatory pollution reductions Five-year average annual return: 4.88% Minimum initial investment: $2,000 Expense ratio: 1.56%, with a one-time upfront fee of 4.75% of initial investment Net assets: $1.15 billion. calvert.com

2. New Alternatives Fund (NALFX) Focus: Foreign and domestic alternative-energy companies Typical stock: German solar-panel maker Conenergy Five-year return: 5.75% Minimum initial investment: $2,500 Expense ratio: 1.17% Net assets: $95 million. newalternativesfund.com

3. Portfolio 21 (PORTX) Focus: Small-cap clean-techs and large-cap companies with sustainability programs Typical stock: Swiss Re, a corporate leader in global-warming awareness Five-year return: 7.2% Minimum initial investment: $5,000 Expense ratio: 1.5% Net assets: $130 million. portfolio21.com

4. PowerShares WilderHill Clean Energy Portfolio (PBW) Focus: Small-cap clean-techs; holdings are identical to those on the WilderHill Clean Energy Index Typical stock: Canadian fuel-cell manufacturer Ballard Power Systems Return since March 2005 inception: 16.04% Minimum initial investment: $50 Expense ratio: 0.7% Net assets: $664 million. powershares.com

5. Winslow Green Growth Fund (WGGFX) Focus: Clean-tech and eco-savvy small- cap companies Typical stock: Zoltek, of St. Louis, a supplier of carbon fiber for wind turbines Five-year return: 8.2% Minimum initial investment: $5,000 Expense ratio: 1.45% Net assets: $290 million. winslowgreen.com

[email this story] Posted by Robert Ouellette on 11/08 Comment Here (0)
2006 11 07
Advances In Solar Power Technology Announced

image
A picture of the Nanosolar solar cell thin technology.

The way Nanosolar Corporation explains it, the future of energy generation just may be clean and non-poluting after all. Nanosolar is at the leading edge of new generation solar cell technologies that do not rely on expensive silicon. In fact, their process is less than one-half the cost and only 1/100th the thickness of traditional solar cells. Even more remarkable is that Nanosolar power cells can be “printed” on flexible substrates allowing for rapid scale production.

The company’s mission?

A Solar Panel on Every Building®—so that buildings everywhere will be hybrid energy buildings, synergistically switching between clean locally-produced solar energy (used during peak-time electricity usage hours just when electricity is the most valuable) and grid-delivered backend power (delivered in the evening or whenever the solar resources are not available).

Here is how they explain Nanosolar’s breakthrough technology:

The ability to architect and assemble materials on a nanometer scale now makes it possible to optimize solar cells at the very length scale at which the relevant photovoltaic semiconductor quantum-physics occurs.  Molecular self-assembly techniques for instance now give us the unprecedented capability of designing and creating nanostructured materials with novel properties.  Such techniques generally rely on formulas that control the precise, bottom-up chemical assembly of molecules into geometric structures composed of many molecules, e.g. in the 1nm to 100nm range.

In other words, nanotechnology allows them to dispense with expensive, difficult to manufacture elements of traditional solar cells. What remains is easy to produce using thin-film technology.

Even the normally staid Economist is excited by the news. “The technology exists to enable a radical overhaul of the way in which energy is generated, distributed and consumed – an overhaul whose impact on the energy industry could match the internet’s impact on communications.” Now that is a future we can aspire to.

[email this story] Posted by Robert Ouellette on 11/07 Comment Here (0)
2006 11 06
Honda Civic Hybrid: Making A Difference

image

Maybe I feel the need to write a story on hybrid cars because a well-to-do family I know recently bought a Hummer, Their rationalization was the usual one: to help protect their kids. Sigh. Or maybe it is the recent surge of news about the environment or how the north american auto industry - once the world’s great economic engine - is just about officially dead. Whatever the motivation, Honda’s new hybrid Civic almost makes me believe that big automotive companies can get it right . This is what the Honda site says about the hybrid:

The 2007 Civic Hybrid: Smokin’ Style, Fresher Air
Directly descended from the Honda CVCC, which was the first car to pass the Clean Air Act emissions requirement without a catalyst, the 2007 Civic Hybrid wows with a futuristic shape and high-tech features. Today’s Civic Hybrid represents the very latest in our commitment to positive environmental change.

You’ll feel the benefits of the refined gasoline-electric powertrain on the Civic Hybrid right there in your wallet at fill-up time. And with an EPA city/highway rating of 49/51 mpg,* you won’t have to stop for quite a while.The air also benefits with the Advanced Technology Partial Zero-Emission Vehicle (AT-PZEV) rating, which is the most stringent emissions standard achieved by a gasoline-powered vehicle in the U.S. And mile after mile, you get to enjoy the thoroughly modern style, comfort and convenience of a Honda Civic. The Civic Hybrid is living proof that environmentalism and style can go hand in hand.

Those MPG ratings are in U.S. gallons. This is a seriously fuel-efficient car.

Along with this car Honda is promoting its green “Environmentology“ campaign. Take a look at this site. Honda wins the best CEO quote of the decade award with this from their former President and CEO, Hiroyuki Yoshiro. “By the year 2010, Honda wants to be . . . a company that all people . . . from all over the world will want to exist.”

Can we say that about north american auto producers? Not as they exist today but companies can and do change when faced with consumers who demand better products. 

[email this story] Posted by Robert Ouellette on 11/06 Comment Here (0)
2006 11 04
November 4th, 2056: The Last Fish In The World Dies

image

Industry pundits are agreeing today that early 21st century environmental scientists and fisheries experts were right when they predicted the world’s fish stocks would be depleted by mid-century. However, the industry spokespeople explained that protein tablets made from tar byproducts were just as healthy as fish protein and cost far less. Plans to increase the number of drilling platforms around the North Pole were also announced. “Ever since the troublesome ice finally melted,” said one, “exploiting the world’s last remaining reserves of crude oil is now financially viable.”

[email this story] Posted by Robert Ouellette on 11/04 Comment Here (2)
2006 11 03
Sustainable Living Goes Mobile

image

image

The tireless Canadian architect and innovator Lloyd Alter has done it again. As a force behind Context Development’s seminal Niagara Street condo project, Alter showed the local design community he understands the market for smart, modernist design. He is back with a product that is so evolutionary - or perhaps revolutionary - that it is the answer to mass-produced, green living for the rest of us.

image

Alter and co. recently launched http://www.sustain.ca to promote his new miniHome line of self-contained, turn-key, ecological homes. While not completely zero-footprint, the new miniHomes come as close to it as anything found anywhere. This lifts Alter and the home’s designer, Andy Thomson, and indeed Canadian sustainable design, to the top ranks of the exploding eco-industry. Why? Take a look at the miniHome’s energy conserving features:

All miniHomes feature a standalone, renewables-ready, hybrid propane-electric* energy system, which consists of:

* A 2kW sine-wave inverter - handles all plug loads, offering conventional household 110V AC power, for household appliances.
* 400 amp-hours of sealed, gel-battery storage - enough to get you through the grey and/or windless days
* AC/DC Breaker and Fusepanel, all lights, pumps and fans run on 12VDC - saving even more energy
* Fridge, Range, Furnace and Hot Water are fuelled by propane, from 2 x 30lb bottles located outside
* Space heating is provided by the passive solar design (if site orientation permits) and a forced-air, 10,000 Btu furnace, with heat recovery from our passive HRV. * Hot water is delivered by a 13 gallon Suburban water heater. Refrigeration is handled with a 3-way (propane/ac/dc) refrigerator, and cooking is done with a 3-burner stainless, slide-in range with sealed burners and an oven. The furnace, hot-water heater, range and fridge all feature piezo-electric ignition.

Cooling is also achieved passively by means of high volume exhaust, low air inlets, breathing/rainscreen cladding and naturally by our roofgarden. Only brutally, arid, or jungle - humid climates may require an additional cooling unit.

Now, all of those energy saving stats may have made you think that living in a miniHome is like living in a laboratory. Far from it. Thomson used his knowledge of modern, attractive design to make this a comfortable, well-considered home. That it is also environmentally leading-edge and affordable - prices start at just over $100k - makes it irresistible. Think of it as a Smart Car for living and you will be on the right track.

image

[email this story] Posted by Robert Ouellette on 11/03 Comment Here (0)
2006 11 01
Do You Have A Black Cloud Over Your Head?

image
Ignoring global warming won’t make it go away. Join the WWF and Newmindspace tomorrow, November 2nd, at Metro Hall Square as they create a black cloud to demonstrate how much an average Canadian is contributing to climate change. For more information go to: http://www.saveourclimate.ca and http://www.wwf.ca/blog

[email this story] Posted by Robert Ouellette on 11/01 Comment Here (0)
2006 10 30
3.1 Billion Pounds of Exhaust To Bury 1.5 Billion Pounds Of Solid Waste

image

Dump image from York University’s Environmental Studies web site

Mayoralty candidates Stephen LeDrew, Rod Muir, and Jane Pitfield joined the Alphabet City Trash Festival crew Saturday night at the MaRS Centre on College Street to discuss the city’s garbage crisis (Mayor Miller declined the invitation to attend). In spite of what many people in our city seem to think about political candidates in general, those people who came to listen and ask questions found that the three performed well - they had ideas that might even work to reduce our city’s ecological footprint.

While researching my preamble to the evening’s discussion - I moderated the event - it occurred to me that the real cost in environmental impact terms of shipping tons of garbage hundreds of kilometers was never made public. I wanted to know how much air pollution a truck creates when carrying one ton of cargo one kilometer. With that information in hand it would be easy to determine how much invisible damage our NIMBYism was inflicting on the environment.

According to a study sighted by the Victoria Transit Policy Institute, in 2002 transport trucks produced on average 12.7 pounds of pollution emissions per ton per mile (or roughly 8 pounds per kilometer).

The Michigan dump site is about 260 miles from Toronto or 418 kilometers.

In 2005 we sent 86 trucks a day 365 days of the year to Michigan. They carried a total of 750,000 tons of Toronto garbage. That is 1.5 billion pounds of solid waste.

So, let’s do the math. For the sake of fairness, we will reduce the pollution generated on the empty return trip to Toronto to one-quarter. To do that we will say the trucks travelled only 100 kilometers on the way back.

Total trip length 418 + 100 = 518 kilometers

Total pollution per kilometer = 8 pounds

Total Tons shipped = 750,000

Then 518 x 8 x 750,000 = 3,108,000,000 pounds of tailpipe pollution.

There it is folks. To move 1.5 billion pounds of garbage so we don’t have to face our local responsibilities for waste reduction and management, we create at minimum 3.1 billion pounds of “Invisible” waste not to mention the other physical problems having those trucks on the roads produces (this does not factor in the pollution created by the truck drivers in turn driving to their jobs, manufacturing the trucks, producing diesel fuel, etc.,). The purchase of a new dump in Ontario reduces the amount of pollution but is still unconscionable. Toronto has to deal with its local waste issues locally.

To the panelists’ credit, that was their position. Each offered different approaches. Given Rod Muir’s experience as founder of Waste Diversion Toronto, it was not surprising that he had probably the best practical solutions to reducing Toronto’s waste. Jane Pitfield was a close second given her long experience on City Council and as Chair of the Works Committee, she knew the issues from the perspective of an involved politician. Stephen LeDrew was a contender in spirit but seemed - and this is from the awkward perspective of the moderator who cannot be as objective as an audience member - passionate about the issue but not as informed.

Incineration, or more accurately gasification, was discussed and all three agreed that it could be used if, and only if, pollutants we rigorously controlled. Rod Muir was least in favour of the option saying only 5% of the city’s waste need be dealt with this way. Still, when faced with the fact of how much air pollution we generate trucking garbage to Michigan, it is hard to imagine (...read more...)

[email this story] Posted by Robert Ouellette on 10/30 Comment Here (0)
2006 10 27
Wind Energy Financing Makes A Breakthrough

image

Image from www.dailkos.com of the North Hoyle wind turbine installation.

Corporate Knights editor Toby Heaps’ story this issue on green power in Ontario got me thinking about how antiquated methods of project financing are a major barrier to the wider development of sustainable energy sources. So I did some research on who in the international financial community is leading the way in green energy project financing. This announcement is about the first non-recourse financing for off-shore wind farms in the industry:

EUR 379 M Facilities for the construction and operation of an offshore wind farm

ROTTERDAM/UTRECHT, 25 October 2006 - Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen Boerenleenbank B.A. (Rabobank) and Dexia Credit Local (Dexia) as Mandated Lead Arrangers, and Eksport Kredit Fonden (EKF), as export credit agency, have closed on 25 October 2006 the financing for the construction and operation of the Q7 windfarm, a 120 MW offshore wind park, comprising 60 Vestas V-80 wind turbine generators, located off the Dutch coast near IJmuiden. This financing is believed to be the first ever non recourse financing for an offshore wind farm.

Ontario and Canada’s potential for these kinds of wind projects is virtually limitless as long as we have the financing on the front end and an adequate distribution network on the back end. The Dutch financing is a breakthrough and will no doubt become a reference standard for green financing in the future. If, as Toby writes, Canadian investors like the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board are indeed looking for large, green infrastructure projects, they will reference Rabobank, Dexia, and EKF’s move as an indication that institutional funds are moving in the right direction.

[email this story] Posted by Robert Ouellette on 10/27 Comment Here (0)
2006 10 26
Smart Cars and Bicycles

image
OK. The owners of this Smart Car in Toronto’s Riverdale district deserve some kind of award for their dedication to leaving a small footprint behind. We had to chuckle a bit when we saw this - the bikes are as big as the car. But this combination of energy efficiency is like a white dwarf: Small but incredibly powerful.

With 100 MPG for the car and about 750 calories each per hour for the bikes, a quick calculation suggests that this combo can displace about six or seven normal cars. Not bad really. It’s economical too.

[email this story] Posted by Robert Ouellette on 10/26 Comment Here (0)
2006 10 25
Offsetting Your Company’s Carbon Footprint

image
In the latest issue of our magazine Peter Diplaros took a look at six companies that can help you offset your company’s carbon emissions. Need to know more? Take a look at the following:

http://www.cleanairpass.com
Cleanairpass allows motorists to offset their car’s carbon footprint based on mileage. You get some nice stickers too.

http://www.offsetter.ca
Use PayPal to buy your friends a carbon offset… no, really! You can even buy offsets for the flights you plan on taking. Who needs a guilty conscience?

http://www.self.org
This unique site brings solar power and modern communications to villages in the developing world.

http://www.econeutral.com
Econeutral branding, the site claims, increases a company’s brand value by letting its customers know it cares about the environment. Good idea.

http://www.carbonneutral.com
This company will carry out emission assessments and identifies offset alternatives that reduce local emissions.

http://www.bullfrogpower.com
Bullfrog Power sells green electric power. You buy your power from the grid as usual but Bullfrog generates a matching amount for th egrid from green sources like hydro and wind power.

[email this story] Posted by Robert Ouellette on 10/25 Comment Here (0)
Page 43 of 44 pages « First  <  41 42 43 44 >
Read what people are saying about the environmental issues that impact us all

Blog posts about wind energy
Blog posts about sustainability
Blog posts about green investing
Blog posts about hybrid autos
Blogs mentioning Zerofootprint
The best green news sources on the Net
Hugg
Green Car Congress
Green Girls Global
Grist
Eco Worrier
Inhabitat
Lime
Real Climate
Treehugger
World Changing