|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
2007 04 20
Shrink your carbon footprint - Times Online
Harper's green initiatives inadequate says NDP Energy Critic - New Democratic Party of Canada (p
Government of Canada: Integrated Addiction Recovery Centre opens … - CCNMatthews (press release)
2007 04 19
IMF says slowing US economy will echo in Canada - Business Edge
Don't Bet on Offsets: Erasing Your 'Carbon Footprint' Is a Tricky … - The Nation.
A winter of Liberal discontent - Economist
Making Canada A Green Economic Tiger
About a generation ago, small, resource poor Singapore evolved into an “economic tiger” after it decided to be a world centre of excellence for high-tech research and development. At the time, as some of you may remember, their plan was laughed at by many of the world’s economists and established technology players. The region’s resulting economic success proved that Singapore’s forward-thinking leaders were right. Step into today’s Canada and listen to John Baird’s reasons why we cannot possibly embrace sustainability - it will kill our economy - the pundits say. The last reduction of carbon emissions on this scale, quote some, was when the Soviet Union collapsed. Get their meta-message? Carbon reduction equals economic and social collapse you tree-hugging fools. Of course, they are tragically wrong but that doesn’t matter. Resource industries will dominate policy-making and business leaders from that sector will retire wealthy, develop a green conscience, and be heard saying in documentaries how they knew it all along and did the best they could to change the system from within. So it goes. What they don’t understand is that the green revolution is more than just a social trend: it is a disruptive technological trend too. What does that mean? Like the early days of high-tech when Singapore saw the future and it was computer-based, many entrepreneurs and investors around the globe are looking forward and seeing economic opportunity in being green. In fact, many argue that sustainable technology is the greatest economic opportunity ever encountered. Where are our leaders? Right now they are saying we can’t go forward. We have to maintain the status-quo. Economic peril awaits us if we try to be green.
In some ways they are right. Sizing up new markets is risky. They might just be wrong. But what is there to lose? We all know that the oil boom only has another generation or so before it collapses. What comes after that and who will then be the dominant economic players? If we act now Ontario and Canada could be an economic tiger the like of which we can only imagine. But we have to risk change and embrace innovation. Who will lead us into the future?
The Governator charts a green path - Ottawa Citizen (subscription)
2007 04 18
Green politics requires shift in consciousness - ChronicleHerald.ca
Reducing Sunderland's carbon footprint - 24dash.com
French Postal Service Goes Green
This proactive step taken by the French makes us wonder… why isn’t Canada’s postal service doing something similar? In fact, any large urban delivery services should be making this change not only to be green but to do the things businesses do, save money.
2007 04 17
Walrus Magazine Comments On Harper’s New Green Persona
Ken Alexander of Walrus Magazine takes a poke at Stephen Harper’s new found interest in the environment.
Take a look at the whole story. As we’ve come to expect from Walrus, it is a good read.
2007 04 16
Peak Oil Projections Explained
If you've seen the movie, "Peak Oil," you know the world is facing some serious economic challenges in the coming decades as the result of diminished oil suplies combined with increasing oil demand. For example, did you you know that 10% of all the oil ever consumed was used in the first six years of G.W. Bush's presidency? That is a sobering statistic. This information is so important to get out to the public that I am going to do something I normally would not do: post a complete story from another site. The following comes from http://www.theoildrum.com We ask for their understanding as it is the most cohernet description of the upcoming crisis that I've read. This is a guest post by Alan Drake, a letter he sent to his youngest brother. Peak Oil in Greater Detail“Oil companies should fire all of their geologists and geophysicists and hire economists to replace them since economists are SO much better at finding oil”. Here's some random facts to illustrate how inelastic supply of oil is once an oil province hits it’s “Hubbert Peak” and the super giant fields deplete... In 1972, Texas produced more oil than ever before, up by 40 percent during the previous 10 years at relatively low prices. In the next 10 years, the price of oil increased ten fold (1000%). Drilling exploded far above any historic record. The success rate plummeted, the number of producing wells increased by only 14%, and oil production dropped back to 1962 levels in 1982. 1962-1972 Texas 1972-1982 Texas 2002-2015 Saudi Arabia ? The last two super giant oil fields found in the world were both found in Kazakhstan. One in the late 1980s and the other in 2000. The last field, Kashagan (expected to produce 1 million b/day at peak) is now thought likely to go into production in 2012 and full production shortly thereafter. (ANWR has about a 5% probability of being a supergiant per one estimate (USGS ?)). 13 years from discovery to production for remaining frontier areas (ANWR is estimated as 10 years from lease to first production and 16 to 20 years till peak production). 10% of all the oil ever consumed was consumed in GW Bush’s first term. By some estimates, 10% of all the conventional oil left will be consumed in his second term. This is the power of exponential growth. EROEI (Energy return on energy invested) is declining for oil production from 100:1 in 1960s (world wide) to 8:1 today. Energy used in oil production is largely oil and natural gas. Corn ethanol has an EROEI of about 1.3:1, sugar cane ethanol 6 to 8:1 (better with manual harvesting), Canadian tar sands are about 4:1. At Peak Coal in UK (1913), 18% of the coal produced was used for coal production. EROEI of 5.3:1 not counting the solar energy indirectly fueling the mules. The Export Land Model is that as oil prices rise, oil exporting nations economies boom and domestic consumption rises rapidly (and domestic markets are shielded from price signals for political reasons). Oil exports thus decline much faster than oil production. In 2006, Russia was a textbook case of Export Land as production rose modestly but exports fell modestly with about a 5% spread. The Finance Minister of Russia predicts the same thing for 2007-2009. The Energy Minister of Russia warns of a production crash after 2010. Under the partially true and partially false assumption (...read more...)
2007 04 12
SmartPower Energy’s $10,000 Green Video Competition On YouTube
We know there are many aspiring film-makers in our audience. Now you have an opportunity to use your creative skills while advancing the environmental cause. Here is one of the contestants in SmartPower Energy’s competition:
2007 04 11
Greening Houses Costs How Much?
In case you were wondering how much more an eco-friendly home costs to build, well, the British Government knows the answer. A green home will cost aout three percent more. Not bad really considering. Let’s say that 3% adds $9,000 to the cost of an average new Canadian home. Over the term of that home’s first mortgage that $9,000 investment is more than paid off.
1. A copy of the Cyril Sweet research, “A Cost Review of the Code for Sustainable Homes” can be downloaded from either the Publications page or www.housingcorp.gsx.gov.uk 2. The house types considered were:
3. The scenarios applied to each house type were:
4. English Partnerships is the government’s national regeneration agency delivering high quality, sustainable growth in England. We do this by developing our portfolio of strategic projects and acting as the government’s advisor on brownfield land. We also ensure that surplus public sector assets are used to support wider government objectives, especially those contained in the Sustainable Communities Plan. English Partnerships helps create communities where people can afford to live and want to live. Information on projects and programmes can be found at www.englishpartnerships.co.uk 5. The Housing Corporation is the Government agency responsible for investing in new affordable homes and regulating over 1,500 housing associations across England. Its biggest ever investment programme of £3.9 billion for 2006-08 will fund 84,000 homes; 49,000 of these will be for affordable rent, and 35,000 will be for affordable sale through the Government’s new HomeBuy initiative, helping people to get a foot on the property ladder. 6. Cyril Sweett established a Sustainabilty team (...read more...) |
Read what people are saying about the environmental issues that impact us all
Blog posts about wind energy
Blog posts about sustainability
Blog posts about green investing
Blog posts about hybrid autos
Blogs mentioning Zerofootprint
|
The best green news sources on the Net
Hugg
Green Car Congress
Green Girls Global
Grist
Eco Worrier
Inhabitat
Lime
Real Climate
Treehugger
World Changing
|
|||||||||||