2006 12 15
Green Party Wants Major-Party Nod

image

Elizabeth May, leader of Canada’s “Green Party,“ wants that party recognized as a major political contender. Right now, the Greens are seen as Canada’s fifth party after the Bloc, NDP, Liberals, and the Conservatives. That means May does not have access to the public stage during, for example, debates among the top political parties.

May contends that recent polls show her party is gaining popularity and it should be included in debates. May ran for a position in the House of Parliament during a recent by-election in London, Ontario. She came in second ahead of a well-known Conservative candidate—the city’s former mayor. May stresses in a Globe and Mail interview:

“The last set of debates were a mockery of democracy where other party leaders got away with the debate format to give pre-scriped sound bites.

I think the inclusion of someone with, obviously, nothing to lose and the intense commitment to ensuring that truth comes out will actually have a saluatory effect on teh debates. And, if nothing else, ladies and gentlemen, I promise you better television."

All of this happens as Stephen Harper’s Conservatives lose ground on the environmental front and former Prime Minister Brian Mulroney criticizes the party for its anaemic environmental performance. Conservative lightweight Rona Ambrose—Harper’s answer to Canada’s environmental concerns—may be on the way out as the party wakes up to the fact that it needs more than a pretty face on the environmental front. One wonders what they were thinking about when they made this choice for Environmental Minister.

May, however, offers damning praise for her Conservative counterpart:

“I actually think that she’s been performing admirably under the instructions given her by her boss, which is to confuse the Canadian public, avoid doing anything on the environment while pretending she’s doing it."

Canadian politics needs another strong voice to join in the environmental debate in this country. It is time to acknowledge the political legitimacy of the Green Party.

[email this story] Posted by Robert Ouellette on 12/15 Comment Here (0)
2006 12 14
Bad Day For The Environment

image
Much of the environmental news today is bleak. First, the rare Baiji Dolphin found in the Yangtze River in China has been declared extinct by scientists.

Wuhan, 13 December 2006 – The Baiji Yangtze Dolphin is with all probability extinct.  On Wednesday, in the city of Wuhan in central China, a search expedition, under the direction of the Institute for Hydrobiology Wuhan and the Swiss-based baiji.org Foundation, drew to a finish without any results.

This is the first extinction of a major mammal since the demise of the Caribbean Monk Seal in the 1950s.

Do you remember leaded gasoline? It has long been a thing of the past, right? It turns out that the U.S. EPA is contemplating bringing it back.

The Environmental Protection Agency said this week that revoking those standards might be justified “given the significantly changed circumstances since lead was listed in 1976” as an air pollutant, claiming that concentrations of lead in the air have dropped more than 90 percent in the past 2 1/2 decades. Battery makers, lead smelters, refiners all have lobbied the administration to do away with the Clean Air Act limits.

And there is a report out (sorry, I don’t have a link yet) that condemns the Ontario Government’s decision to build more nuclear power stations. More on this as it develops.

[email this story] Posted by Robert Ouellette on 12/14 Comment Here (0)
2006 12 13
Enviro-Tower Gets More Funding

When we talk to the investment community about the projects they feel are going to have a significant impact on the environment, they focus on the size of a market and then the proprietary nature of a new green technology to serve that market. That’s the way venture investors judge projects. Size, ownership, and return on investment. Investors go where there is money to be made. That’s why we were happy to read an announcement that Toronto’s own, Enviro-Tower, just received a new investment of $8 million from a consortium of Canadian and U.S. V.C. firms. If the venture capital community thinks there is an opportunity here then this product may well be on its way to helping save precious water everywhere there is a HVAC equipped building.

[email this story] Posted by Robert Ouellette on 12/13 Comment Here (0)
2006 12 12
Green Rooftops Of Toronto & Other Energy Saving News
image

Did you know that the Royal York Hotel has a secret, chefs only herb garden fourteen or so storeys above the din of Bay Street? I didn't until this August. One of the city's overlooked but very worthwhile organizations is the Green Tourism Association.

Leanne Minichillo, the media relations co-ordinator for the GTA (is that an in joke among the city's treehugging community?) brought us to the Royal York during an afternoon tour of some of the city's eco-friendly spots -- including those on rooftops. Another is the 10,000 square foot garden found at Mountain Equipment Co-Op on King Street West.

Interested in exploring Toronto's hidden eco spaces? Toronto's Green Tourism Association can take you to them.

On other green friendly news, a new car sharing company -- ZipCar -- is changing the way Torontonians drive:
As the largest car sharing company in the nation, we have learned through extensive research, about the significant, positive environmental impact of sharing a car. There are three major effects:

Members shed cars. Over 40% of our members decide against purchasing a car, or end up selling their car.

They drive less. Car usage of individuals is reduced by as much as 50%.

They use other transportation. Members use the most efficient means of transportation for the task—walking, biking, public transportation, taxi, or Zipcar.

With each Zipcar replacing over 20 privately owned vehicles, we're changing the urban landscape.

Older cars are replaced with new ones that have more stringent pollution controls.

Green space is preserved as fewer parking spaces are required to meet the driving needs of the same number of people.

Less strain on urban parking infrastructure—saving businesses, governments, and universities money.

Lower fuel consumption means fewer greenhouse gas emissions and particulates.

And yes, less congestion on the roadways.
[email this story] Posted by Robert Ouellette on 12/12 Comment Here (0)
2006 12 11
Designing The Future: Do We Have To Leave The Planet?

image
The Telegraph ran a story last week about Dr. Steven Hawking’s view of our collective future on earth. The news is not good in the sense that Hawking thinks that to ensure our future we have to find other planets to sustain ourselves:

Mankind will need to venture far beyond planet Earth to ensure the long-term survival of our species, according to the world’s best known scientist, Professor Stephen Hawking.

Stephen Hawking says space is his next goal
Returning to a theme he has voiced many times before, the Cambridge University cosmologist said today that space-rockets propelled by the kind of matter/antimatter annihilation technology popularised in Star Trek would be needed to help Homo sapiens colonise hospitable planets orbiting alien stars.

And he disclosed his own ambition to go into space. “Maybe Richard Branson will help me,” he said, a reference to the space tourism plans of Virgin tycoon Sir Richard Branson, using the privately built SpaceShipOne to take people into space from 2008.

From an environmental policy perspective, the hope that there is a future for Homo sapiens beyond our planet is worrying. After all, why solve our problems here when we can go somewhere else? That is the history of our species and now that we’ve run out of room to expand on earth, well, let’s go somewhere else and continue the destructive process there.

Now, I doubt that is what Hawking intended, but the people who influence government spending use this idea to promote research in the theoretical physics behind interstellar travel. While I’m not against advancing our knowledge of the universe, it is critical that we focus financial and intellectual resources to solve the environmental challenges we face here, today.

The future may indeed include our travel to other worlds that can sustain us; however, given the urgency of our local problems the much bigger challenge is not a theoretical one. It is practical. We need to ameliorate existing environmental problems and prevent them from worsening. And that is not theory.

[email this story] Posted by Robert Ouellette on 12/11 Comment Here (0)
2006 12 08
Prevention and Offset: Two Approaches to Turning down the Thermometer

image

Making amends is as natural a human inclination as any. So it’s not surprising that as climate change concerns climb up the totem pole, enterprising organisations are selling cool escape clauses (offsets) that promise to help balance off our energy intensive lifestyles by planting new trees or replacing dirty power with solar power. This is a pretty cool new green market space as long as it is treated as the second layer, where the first layer is trying to reduce as much as possible.

*For easy ways to reduce our climate footprint, Prince Charles is keen on Global Cool.

*Wondering how to make sense of all these offset offerings? A Consumer’s Guide to Retail Offsetters is a good place to start.

*What celebrity eco-activist/corporate types would you like to see battle it out in a climate footprint face-off? We’ll be measuring their climate footprints and giving them 3 months to improve. The person with the biggest per cent reduction wins. Email me your suggestions at toby[at]corporateknights.ca.

[email this story] Posted by Stacey Bowman on 12/08 Comment Here (0)
Sustainable Businesses: Steve Mann’s Hydraulophone


Playing in the water: Even on cold Fall and Winter days, people are still drawn to play in the water to experience the soulful call of the hydraulophone, a sound sculpture and musical instrument that you play by putting your fingers on water jets. Hydraulophones used as landscape architecture give aquatic play a sophisticated and spiritually uplifting artistic element that draws people of all ages, not just children, to play in the water.



By Steve Mann

"Urban Beaches" ("urbeaches")
are spaces that cross or challenge the traditional boundaries that have existed between professional civic life and the more playful elements of recreational life.


The urbeach mixes the formal majestic tone of urban life with the informal playful tone of beach life.


Toronto presently has two prime examples of urbeaches:
Dundas Square (at Yonge and Dundas); and TELUSCAPE (the landscape architecture out in front of Ontario Science Centre). A third one is also in the works: The Rosenberg/Cormier design known as HTO, the "Urban Beach" garden on the waterfront, at Queens Quay W. and the foot of John St..


It is a wonderfully telling sign, that two of Toronto's architectural landmarks, Dundas Square, and the Ontario Science Centre, each feature an aquatic play facility as their main centerpiece.


Dundas Square, for example, is considered to be the city's "symbolic core", quoting a previous Reading Toronto article:


Planners decided to make the corner of Yonge and Dundas the city's symbolic core.


The heart of Dundas Square, itself the "Heart of the City" is peppered with 600 ground spray nozzles, arranged in twenty groups of 30 nozzles each, each group supplied with three two-inch water pipes. On hot summer days, joggers running through the 20 fountains experience
the equivalent of running through sixty firehoses. The entire facility is supplied with three eight-inch water pipes, making it one of Toronto's most "FROLICious" experiences. It is this placement of fun and frolic at the epicenter of civic culture that defines what I mean by "urban beach".


Similarly, the Ontario Science Centre was looking for something "magestic" with which to replace the big but aging fountain out in front of their building.


The hydraulophone that is now the main centerpiece out in front of the Ontario Science Centre serves three main roles:


  1. it is an architectural display fountain, like other large fountains that visually define a landmark, iconic representation, or the like;
  2. it provides an aquatic play experience, and it invites people of all ages to "play in the water";
  3. it is a visual art sculpture, a sound sculpture, and a musical instrument, thus bringing art, music, culture, and play into the mix.

    This lends itself to a nice double-entendre: "The Key to good music is to PLAY in the water", i.e. "play" as in playing a musical instrument (or having fun playing
    around on a sound sculpture even if you are not musical), and "play" as in what you would do in a playground or aquatic play area.


    Children will play in almost any fountain, but adults, no matter how hot the weather, will often feel that it is too childish to run through a fountain. Making an aquatic play experience sophisticated enough to attract people of all ages is a challenge successfully addressed by the hydraulophone.


    Additionally, the hydraulophone creates a sense of awe and wonder that takes aquatic play to a spiritual and cerebral level, so that it is no longer necessary to drench the whole body with water to have a fun and thrilling experience. A small amount of water on the fingertips proves sufficient to provide an overwhelming sense of tactile pleasure.

(...read more...)

[email this story] Posted by Robert Ouellette on 12/08 Comment Here (1)
2006 12 06
Climate Change Low on Teens’ Lists of Global Problems

image

Humans tend to worry about immediate threats. Being robbed. Getting cancer. Losing their job, and in the case of teenagers, not getting into college. Our instinct for self-preservation is strongest in the case of our own living, breathing bodies and weakest when it comes to the human race as a whole. This is a necessary fact of life in the urban jungles of some of the world’s largest cities, and perhaps more so for the teenagers that call them home.

A poll conducted in October by Synovate for the BBC World Service surveyed 3050 teenagers in ten cities around the world: London, England; New York, USA; Nairobi, Kenya; Cairo, Egypt; Lagos, Nigeria; Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Baghdad, Iraq; Delhi, India; Jakarta, Indonesia; and Moscow, Russia.

On a ‘personal level’ the teenagers polled indicated that the most important issue to them at the moment was Education (38%), followed distantly by Terrorism (19%). Career (17%) and Aids (14%) rounded out the double digit percentiles, while Hunger, Obesity and Climate Change (a miniscule 3% worried about this the most) were at the back of their minds.

If we run with the idea that teens are concerned mostly with themselves, its not unreasonable to consider their concerns and opinions to be a litmus test of the average adult’s visceral, instinctual reactions. Of course adults (or some of them anyway) attempt to push beyond their immediate reactions and think of someone other than themselves—their children for example, their country, or perhaps even the human race.

When the teenagers were asked what which issue was most important on a global scale, their answers were slightly different. Terrorism vaulted to the top of the pack with 36% (and a whopping 63% in New York, which has had one terrorist attack in the last decade as opposed to Baghdad, which suffers one nearly once a week and where 59% cited it as the most important issue). Education retained second place with 25%, Aids stayed in third with 17%, and Climate Change was still down at the bottom with 5%.

Flip back in your mind for a moment to Maslow’s Hierarchy of needs from middle school guidance class. Basic needs such as food and shelter, sleep, warmth and sex come first. Security from bodily harm, comfort and peace comes next, then social needs (belonging to a group and acceptance), then self-esteem, and at the tip top of the pyramid, intellectual stimulation and opportunities for creativity and innovation. It could be argued that climate change is the only truly global threat in the list the teenagers were given to choose from. Terrorism doesn’t touch every part of the world—though North American news might make one think it does. Aids is a health threat and therefore needs to be worried about—but at least there are ways to prevent yourself from contracting it, if your lucky enough to get your hands on one (too many are not). Education could be grouped with intellectual stimulation at the top of Maslow’s pyramid, but if one thinks about it as necessary for prosperity, and therefore health, security and safety, it makes sense. Yet there are places in the world where education is free.

Climate change is going to affect every single person on earth eventually—through the weather their country receives, resource shortages, the economic changes and challenges it will bring, and the erasure of entire cities (including New York). But these threats are not immediate enough. The possibility that a teenager in any one of these cities could contract HIV is immediate. Immediate is the question of how to become educated, find a job and feed (...read more...)

[email this story] Posted by Stacey Bowman on 12/06 Comment Here (0)
New Green Architecture

image

One of the requirements of sustainable architecture is density: increased housing density reduces a community’s aggregate demand for energy. Now imagine the typical North American suburban home of the last generation. They boast a single dwelling on large plots of land surrounded by metres of pesticide-soaked, fresh-mown grass. To survive, they require vast infrastructures of roads, cars, sewers, electricity generation, gasoline production, natural gas pipelines, and more. Their waste pollutes our air, streams and lakes. They gobbled up millions of acres of Canada’s prime agricultural land and disrupt our aquifers. They are not sustainable.

Unfortunately, those kinds of dwellings represent the Canadian dream for many of us. Who wants to live in a condo when it is possible to have people who do make that choice help subsidize—through their taxes—our unsustainable lifestyle. After all, if suburbanites were to pay the real costs of their infrastructure needs they could not afford to live out there on the edge of our cities.

Our dreams may be changing. Architects are offering suburban-like dreams in urban form. Eco-friendly condominium designs that offer external green spaces are being built and our cities may never be the same. Here is a story on one such project:

Urban Cactus is a housing project in the Vuurplaat section of Rotterdam by UCX Architects / Ben Huygen and Jasper Jaegers and done for Vestia Rotterdam Feijenoord/Estrade Projecten.

image

[email this story] Posted by Robert Ouellette on 12/06 Comment Here (0)
2006 12 05
Notes from the Belly of the Liberal Leadership Convention
imageBy Toby Heaps

The environment won and the backroom boys lost. That's the story of this weekend's Liberal Leadership Convention. Although he wasn't on the ballot at the end, John Godfrey kicked off the green revolution in the Red party back in March, when he announced he was running for the leadership in order to put the sustainable economy at the centre of the Liberal Party. Stephane Dion quickly took the green baton from Godfrey, put it at the centre of his three-tiered new liberalism (social justice, environmental sustainability, and economic prosperity) and zestfully ran with it all the way to the finish line this weekend.

Michael Ignatieff, frontrunner until the last ballot, even signed up Jamie MacDonald, a whiz kid PhD who has worked with Natural Step, to be his sustainability guru and craft his carbon tax proposal.

As the campaign wore on all contenders except Joe Volpe caught the green fever (Volpe's theme song was "Life is a Highway". He joked he'd had a good ride in his red Ferrari, and then on Sunday, he showed up for a meeting with Dion, in his red SUV--which he left idling by the curb for a valet to pick up).

imageEven though Dion is the sustainable economy poster child and most of my idealistic Liberal friends were in his corner, some lingering doubts about his cojones remained, leftover from an interview I did with him back when he was Environment Minister. When I asked Dion what he thought about leaders in the business community (like the Shell Chairman) who said a carbon tax would be the best way to meet our Kyoto targets, he recoiled as if I'd hit him with a taser gun. He said carbon tax was a bad idea and wouldn't be considered by a Liberal government.

As I went into the convention centre Monday morning (I got in as media--I'd be reluctant to join any party that would accept me, and besides it's a lot cheaper that way), I was keenest on Gerard Kennedy. I knew that he had the biggest upside (his integrity and work ethic) and downside (his obstinacy), and was at least one Berlitz tape short of speaking passable French--but I understand the guy. In conversations with Liberal powerbrokers I learned he didn't return phone calls or "appreciate favours."

So when it came time for lunch on Friday, I headed off to the Kennedy suite at the Hyatt for an Indian Buffet. In the elevator on the way up, several attractive Kennedy supporters were discussing their tightly fitting gK t-shirts. But they reached a consensus that the Brison camp had the nicer garb: even tighter shirts sported by cute boys.

When I got to the suite I noted two bad omens: One, the food was nowhere to be seen and two, there were some pretty sketchy liberals in the room--the kind you see at nomination meetings rigging outcomes or good-naturedly relishing character assassinations. Usually the sketchy ones are the ambitious ones, so I expected they would be in the Ignatieff camp. Maybe Iggy had a screening process.

It was just as well--Indian food always makes me want to take a nap--and as I made my way to the food court for some soup, I decided Kennedy might have a bigger downside than I thought. He didn't seem to have a clear plan beyond party renewal, and I shuddered to think what would happen if he had the Prime Minister's portfolio in his lap without a well-prepared plan of action. Either there would be gridlock, or he would have to rely on his coterie of (...read more...)
[email this story] Posted by Toby Heaps on 12/05 Comment Here (2)
2006 12 04
Ed Burtynsky: World Changing

image




Nickel Tailings No. 31,
Sudbury, Ontario 1996




Yesterday’s Toronto Star had a good story on Toronto artist Ed Burtynsky. It seems that many are worried Burtynsky’s work will become single-issue posters for environmental issues. While the Liberal’s new leader, Stephane Dion, might say that’s a good thing, it is unlikely that history will come to the same conclusion about the photographs. Burtynsky’s long history of documentation have more to do with the process and effects of massive-scale human activities than they do with the specific environmental impact of those actions. I’ve always thought that his works come from the conceptualist’s tradition which allows him to turns his vision to a host of related topics but maintain an overarching coherence to the work. In his own words:

“It’s one of the dangers I’ve always felt as an artist. I’ve never wanted to do work that boiled down to a singular meaning — `Oh, now we understand exactly where it is, we can put it in this little category — this is work that is pro-environment,’” Burtynsky says.

[email this story] Posted by Robert Ouellette on 12/04 Comment Here (0)
2006 12 03
If Hummers Can Go Green There Is Hope For The Future Of The Planet
image

For Canadians who cringe whenever they see a massive, carbon-belching Hummer squeezing through the streets of our cities, this news may surprise and delight. It turns out that the designers at General Motors -- who have long seemed bent on self-destruction by producing cars few consumers wanted to buy -- have discovered that the world wants green alternatives. A generation late to be sure but suddenly they've embraced the religion of sustainability.

Take a look at their recent proposal for a "green" Hummer. Called the Hummer O2, the car produces oxygen instead of CO2:
This fuel-cell powered Hummer would produce oxygen. Agae-filled body panels could break down C02, a greenhouse gas, releasing oxygen into the atmosphere. When parked, body panels would fan out to catch more light, speeding the process. The 02 would be constructed from 100-percent post-consumer recycled aluminum.

GM and Ford managers have long seemed incapable of responding to consumer demands for fuel-efficiency and reliability. As a result, other car producers in Japan or Germany, for example, where urban density demands a smaller, more economical type of automobile, have stepped in to fill the growing demand for more efficient cars. Jobs in the North American automotive sector are now disappearing as a result of the hubris of their 20th Century management choice to ignore consumer needs and build gas-guzzling beasts like the Hummer.

Many in the green sector can take a degree of "I told you so" satisfaction. After all, it did not take too much prescience to see the future on this issue. We have to wonder why companies engage in these self-destructive choices. Is it a matter of short-term thinking? If so, our manufacturing class must learn from the disruptive forces that are changing their sectors and refocus on the future. If they don't, we will risk handing over our economic prosperity to those countries who will.
[email this story] Posted by Robert Ouellette on 12/03 Comment Here (0)
2006 11 29
Lets Green This City

image
Launched on November 17th., www.letsgreenthiscity.com wants to change the way the citizens of San Francisco think about their city. What better way than to make the idea of a green city impossible to ignore? They decided to make green design interventions at iconic city landmarks. And who can resist sitting on a grass couch. Certainly not the city’s mayor . . .

The project is co-sponsored by the Pacific Gas and Electric Company and ReadyMade Magazine. http://www.letsgreenthiscity.com is one component of a campaign dedicated to making San Francisco the “greenest” city in the United States.

Given the city of Toronto’s obsession with bad street amenities, maybe trying to make the city “green” would result in 21st. century design solutions.

[email this story] Posted by Robert Ouellette on 11/29 Comment Here (0)
2006 11 28
Wal-Mart + Green = Disaster?

Mother Jones has a story by writer Bill McGibbon on the green initiatives of major corporations. McGibbon reflects on the paradox created when short-term profit driven corporations embrace what by nature have to be long-term thinking green initiatives. The results can be jarring:

It makes scant difference whether Wal-Mart starts stocking organic food or not, because the real problem is the imperative to ship products all over the world, sell them in vast, downtown-destroying complexes, and push prices so low that neither workers nor responsible suppliers can prosper. (In fact, Wal-Mart’s decision to sell organic food will almost certainly mean the final consolidation of the industry into the hands of a few huge growers that ship their produce across thousands of miles—not to mention that the people ringing up the organic groceries will still make below-poverty wages and taxpayers will still be footing the bill for their health care. There’s something gross about buying a healthy carrot from a sick company.)

McGibbon’s take is similar to that of the documentary, “The Corporation.” In that film, corporations are portrayed as innately profit-driven entities without a social conscience - sociopaths. As a result, they make choices that are not in the best interest of society.

While this argument contains some truth - maybe a lot of truth - it is ultimately superficial. Why? Like good and bad people, good and bad corporations exist in an overarching political and social environment. If we offer effective regulatory infrastructures like, for instance, ISO sustainability standards, good corporations see the benefits of adopting them and the overall market changes. However, if our government does not make strong compliance regulations, the public cannot fault corporations who, to be competitive, produce goods within the constraints of that regulatory environment. We, as the ultimate recipients of the good and bad results of those decisions, have only ourselves to blame.

So, it may be comforting for us to blame corporations for our environmental problems. They do deserve criticism. However, we must not forget that as citizens we have the choice of getting involved and changing public policy and, as consumers, of not buying from companies who are intentionally and without regret helping to destroy the place we inhabit.

[email this story] Posted by Robert Ouellette on 11/28 Comment Here (0)
2006 11 27
Drastic Ideas For Sustainability
image

Last week the Associated Press reported that scientists at the United Nations conference on climate change offered some "out of the box" ideas on how to reduce global warming. Dr. Paul Grutzen, of Germany's Max Planck Institute, said that unless the world's polluting nations take immediate and strong action to curb emissions we will have to resort to "startling" solutions to the problem. Today, according to Grutzen, the world's policy makers exhibit a "grossly disappointing international political response to warming."

What are Grutzen's startling solutions? Well, they are drastic. One involves hoisting heavy guns to high-altitutes where they would blast the stratosphere with sulphates. This action would have an effect much like that created by the eruption of Mount Pinatubo in 1991. When that volcano erupted it cooled the earth by nine-tenths of a degree for one year.

The need for drastic ideas like this one are closer than you think. They may be one generation away.
[email this story] Posted by Robert Ouellette on 11/27 Comment Here (0)
Page 41 of 43 pages « First  <  39 40 41 42 43 >
Read what people are saying about the environmental issues that impact us all

Blog posts about wind energy
Blog posts about sustainability
Blog posts about green investing
Blog posts about hybrid autos
Blogs mentioning Zerofootprint
The best green news sources on the Net
Hugg
Green Car Congress
Green Girls Global
Grist
Eco Worrier
Inhabitat
Lime
Real Climate
Treehugger
World Changing